Big 12 Rewind: A Look at the League Heading into Conference Play

  0 Jil Price Igara | September 18th, 2018 | Big 12, College - Women's Indoor, News

Overall, the Big 12 has challenged itself against the nation’s best in the non-conference slate, which makes its collective 70-32 (.686) pre-conference mark deceiving.

Top league contenders in Texas and Baylor have each taken 3 losses on the season thus far.

Kansas State, which saw its biggest nonconference matchup at Minnesota cancelled for player safety reasons, brings a league-leading 10-1 mark into conference action, while Texas Tech has notched a league-best 11 victories.

A trio of teams is ranked in VolleyMob’s most recent power rankings release, led by 6th-ranked Texas. Baylor checks in at 12th, followed by Kansas State at 23rd. Iowa State, which has been in and out of the rankings week to week, is currently receiving votes.

VolleyMob projected Texas, which has won 6 conference titles in the last 7 years, to win the Big 12 followed by Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas and TCU. A vote of league coaches produced a similar result with No. 1 Texas, No. 2 Baylor, No. 3 Iowa State, No. 4 Kansas and No. 5 Kansas State.

Standings

Team Record Pct Home Away Neutral Streak Record Pct Home Away Neutral Streak
Kansas State 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 10-1 .909 4-0 4-0 2-1 W8
Texas Tech 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 11-3 .786 3-0 3-2 5-1 W5
Baylor 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 8-3 .727 6-1 1-1 1-1 W3
TCU 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 8-3 .727 8-0 0-1 0-2 W4
Oklahoma 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 8-4 .667 3-0 2-1 3-3 W3
Texas 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 5-3 .625 2-1 0-2 3-0 L2
Kansas 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 6-4 .600 3-3 1-1 2-0 W2
West Virginia 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 7-5 .583 5-1 1-1 1-3 W4
Iowa State 0-0 .000 0-0 0-0 0-0 7-6 .538 3-3 2-2 2-1 L2

VolleyMob Rankings

  • #6 Texas
  • #12 Baylor
  • #23 Kansas State
  • RV Iowa State

Week 1 Schedule

Date Matchup Location Time
Wednesday, Sept. 19 #6 Texas at #23 Kansas State Manhattan, Kan. 7 p.m.
Texas Tech at #12 Baylor Waco, Texas 8 p.m.
RV Iowa State at West Virginia Morgantown, W.Va. 8 p.m.
Oklahoma at TCU Fort Worth, Texas 8 p.m.
Friday, Sept. 21 #23 Kansas State at Oklahoma Norman, Okla. 8 p.m.
Saturday, Sept. 22 West Virginia at Texas Tech Lubbock, Texas 2 p.m.
TCU at Kansas Lawrence, Kan. 2 p.m.
#12 Baylor at Iowa State Ames, Iowa 4 p.m.
Breakdown

Baylor: Despite earning a signature win against Wisconsin, the Lady Bears are searching for consistency in the Big 12 slate.

  • Baylor owns an 8-3 non-conference mark, heading into the Big 12 season. The Lady Bears fell to nationally-ranked UCLA and San Diego, then dropped an uncharacteristic 5-setter to UTRGV.
  • The Lady Bears made history when they knocked off then-ranked 2nd Wisconsin in 4 sets, earning its highest ranked win in program history.
  • Key Players:
    • Yossiana Pressley has been dominant for the Lady Bears, averaging an outstanding 5.09 kills per set and hitting .262 on the season.
    • Shelly Fanning, who averages 3.18 kills per set and owns a .404 attack percentage, is also a consistent offensive threat.

Iowa State: The Cyclones have been in and out of the rankings in andup and down non-conference season and are not at full strength entering the Big 12 slate.

  • Against a strong non-conference schedule, the Cyclones have put up a 7-6 record. Against ranked foes, Iowa State is 1-3 with a win over UNI (3-0) and losses to Utah (3-0, Creighton (3-1), Nebraska (3-0).
  • Iowa State has been playing without sophomore middle blockers Meegan Hart and Avery Rhodes, who are out due to injury.
  • Key Players:
    • Jess Schaben averages 3.52 kills, 2.85 digs and 0.52 blocks per set for the Cyclones.
    • Grace Lazard owns a .330 hitting percentage, while averaging 2.56 kills and 1.19 blocks per set.

Kansas: The Jayhawks look to build upon last year’s 3rd place result in the Big 12 and have a shot at doing so with 4 starters returning plus their libero.

  • Kansas brings a 6-4 mark into the Big 12 schedule, notching back-to-back wins against UNC-Greensboro most recently.
  • The Jayhawks fell in their lone ranked matchup of the non-conference slate to Kentucky in 5 sets.
  • Key Players:
    • Ashley Smith (2.71), Jada Burse (2.54) and Zoe Hill (2.15) average more than 2 kills per set through 10 matches.
    • Hill leads Kansas’ balanced offense with a .322 attack percentage.

Kansas State: The Wildcats bring the league’s best record into conference action at 10-1.

  • Kansas State put together a strong slate to challenge itself early, but through no fault of its own only got to face 2 of the 4 nationally ranked foes. A hurricane cancelled the Wildcats’ match with UCLA and high temperatures in Muturi Pavilion caused a cancellation of their match at Minnesota.
  • The Wildcats’ lone loss came to Marquette in straight sets.
  • Key Players:
    • Kylee Zumach averages a team-high 4.22 kills per set and second-best 2.97 digs per set through 11 matches. She is also strong on the blocking front, averaging 0.75 stuffs per set, and hitting .317 on the season.
    • Sarah Dixon runs the offense, which is hitting .277 collectively, efficiently. She averages 11.86 assists per set.

Oklahoma: The Sooners are off to a strong start under 1st-year head coach Lindsey Gray-Walton with an 8-4 mark and are looking to make a splash in conference play.

  • Oklahoma, which went 3-9 in the league last year, is currently 8-4 and on a 3-match win streak heading into Big 12 play.
  • The Sooners, who have 10 underclassmen on the roster, have met 2 ranked opponents in Colorado (L, 3-0) and Pittsburgh (L, 3-1).
  • Key Players:
    • Alyssa Enneking leads the Sooners with 4.33 kills per set and 2.70 digs per set averages.
    • Paige Anderson is hitting .294 on the season with 69 kills and averages 1.29 blocks per set.

TCU: The Horned Frogs used a 4-match win streak to get back on track this season and head into the Big 12 slate with an 8-3 mark and some positive momentum.

  • TCU has face just one ranked opponent in its pre-conference schedule, falling to Colorado State in 4 sets.
  • The Horned Frogs also saw losses against Florida State (3-0) and Cincinnati (3-2)
  • Key Players:
    • elan McCall has been impressive in her collegiate debut, collecting 3-straight Big 12 Freshman of the Week accolades. She leads the Horned Frogs offensively, averaging 5.05 kills per set and a .273 attack percentage.
    • Anna Walsh owns a .348 attack percentage and averages 3.13 kills per set as well.

Texas: 5-3 is definitely deceiving when it comes to the Longhorns, as 6 of their 8 matches have been against ranked opponents.

  • Preseason favorite Texas opened the season with an exclamation point, going undefeated at the VERT Challenge with wins over Oregon (3-1) and Florida (3-2). Since then, the Longhorns have gone 1-3 against ranked foes, falling to Wisconsin (3-1) once and Stanford twice (3-0, 3-1).
  • The Longhorns did however knock off Kentucky (3-1) and Texas State (3-0) to win the American Campus Classic title.
  • Key Players:
    • Preseason Big 12 Player of the Year Micaya White has been leading the Longhorns all season long, averaging 3.47 kills and 2.53 digs per set and hitting .276 against a strong schedule.
    • Brionne Butler is hitting at a .451 clip, averaging 2.33 kills per set and 1.13 blocks per set.

Texas Tech: 2nd-year head coach Tony Graystone has his squad on the rise again this season. He has the Lady Raiders sitting at 11-3 heading into the Big 12 schedule.

  • Texas Tech registered its first winning season since the early 2000s a year ago at 19-15 and finished as runner-up in the National Invitational Volleyball Championship. It was the most wins in a season for the program since 2000.
  • The Lady Raiders started last season at 11-2 and are off to a similar 11-3 mark in 2018.
  • Key Players:
    • Emily Hill is averaging 3.27 kills per set and 2.65 digs per set to lead the Lady Raiders. She owns a .227 attack percentage on the season.
    • Allison White is hitting at an impressive .443 clip with 100 kills on the season (2.17 per set).

West Virginia: After being chosen to finish last in the preseason, West Virginia will attempt to prove the doubters wrong in 2018.

  • The Mountaineers have a youthful squad this season with a roster comprised of 4 juniors, 6 sophomores and 8 freshman.
  • West Virginia has been up and down so far this season, compiling a 7-5 non-conference mark. The Mountaineers cut their teeth against 2 ranked opponents, including BYU (L, 3-0) and Stanford (L, 3-0).
  • Key Players:
    • Katie DeMeo is hitting .326 on the season and averaging 2.11 kills and 1.61 blocks per set.
    • Katelyn Evans averages 2.50 kills per set and 1.70 digs per set.

Statistically Speaking

RK
1 Texas 8 30 399 13.30 117 982 .287 369 12.30 30 1.00 376 12.53 11 133 78 2.58 506.5 16.9
2 Kansas St. 11 37 532 14.38 163 1331 .277 492 13.30 51 1.38 554 14.97 11 174 98 2.65 681.0 18.4
3 Texas Tech 14 49 632 12.90 211 1663 .253 575 11.73 68 1.39 739 15.08 24 214 131 2.67 831.0 17.0
4 Baylor 11 45 640 14.22 230 1621 .253 607 13.49 50 1.11 675 15.00 4 166 87 1.93 777.0 17.3
5 TCU 11 39 554 14.21 213 1387 .246 523 13.41 54 1.38 597 15.31 14 152 90 2.31 698.0 17.9
6 Iowa St. 13 48 647 13.48 232 1776 .234 606 12.63 56 1.17 798 16.63 25 222 136 2.83 839.0 17.5
7 Oklahoma 12 46 589 12.80 237 1606 .219 554 12.04 47 1.02 672 14.61 16 180 106 2.30 742.0 16.1
8 Kansas 10 42 508 12.10 219 1322 .219 479 11.40 40 0.95 565 13.45 15 190 110 2.62 658.0 15.7
9 West Virginia 12 44 485 11.02 251 1437 .163 457 10.39 42 0.95 582 13.23 14 210 119 2.70 646.0 14.7

Individual Stats

Kills

RK
1 Y Pressley Baylor 11 45 229 5.09 81 564 .262 7 0.16 7 0.16 90 2.00 0 32 32 0.71 252.0 5.6
2 A Enneking Oklahoma 12 46 199 4.33 75 541 .229 5 0.11 4 0.09 124 2.70 1 17 18 0.39 212.5 4.6
3 e McCall TCU 11 39 197 5.05 59 505 .273 6 0.15 9 0.23 109 2.79 3 22 25 0.64 220.0 5.6
4 J Schaben Iowa St. 13 48 169 3.52 55 520 .219 9 0.19 3 0.06 137 2.85 6 19 25 0.52 187.5 3.9
5 E Hill Texas Tech 14 49 160 3.27 56 458 .227 19 0.39 21 0.43 130 2.65 3 20 23 0.47 194.0 4.0
6 K Zumach Kansas St. 11 36 152 4.22 39 356 .317 8 0.22 5 0.14 107 2.97 4 23 27 0.75 172.5 4.8
7 S Fanning Baylor 11 45 143 3.18 30 280 .404 5 0.11 9 0.20 40 0.89 1 48 49 1.09 177.0 3.9
8 A Philo Baylor 11 45 126 2.80 50 354 .215 7 0.16 4 0.09 136 3.02 0 12 12 0.27 136.0 3.0
9 G Lazard Iowa St. 13 48 123 2.56 35 267 .330 8 0.17 15 0.31 39 0.81 5 52 57 1.19 169.0 3.5
10 K Evans West Virginia 12 43 120 2.79 64 373 .150 1 0.02 0 0.00 25 0.58 3 21 24 0.56 133.5 3.1

Attack Percentage

RK
1 B Butler Texas 8 30 70 2.33 15 122 .451 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 0.17 4 30 34 1.13 89.0 3.0
2 A White Texas Tech 13 46 100 2.17 19 183 .443 3 0.07 5 0.11 23 0.50 8 41 49 1.07 133.5 2.9
3 S Fanning Baylor 11 45 143 3.18 30 280 .404 5 0.11 9 0.20 40 0.89 1 48 49 1.09 177.0 3.9
4 Y Bedart-Ghani Texas 5 15 33 2.20 6 76 .355 0 0.00 3 0.20 3 0.20 0 11 11 0.73 41.5 2.8
5 P Williams Kansas St. 9 25 50 2.00 11 110 .355 1 0.04 1 0.04 11 0.44 0 17 17 0.68 59.5 2.4
6 E Sandbothe Kansas St. 9 28 62 2.21 14 136 .353 2 0.07 0 0.00 8 0.29 2 29 31 1.11 78.5 2.8
7 K Keenan Texas Tech 13 46 93 2.02 20 214 .341 3 0.07 0 0.00 5 0.11 7 59 66 1.43 129.5 2.8
8 A Walsh TCU 11 39 116 2.97 37 237 .333 7 0.18 1 0.03 10 0.26 3 32 35 0.90 136.0 3.5
9 G Lazard Iowa St. 13 48 123 2.56 35 267 .330 8 0.17 15 0.31 39 0.81 5 52 57 1.19 169.0 3.5
10 K DeMeo West Virginia 11 38 80 2.11 22 178 .326 0 0.00 0 0.00 7 0.18 7 54 61 1.61 114.0 3.0

Assists

RK
1 S Dixon Kansas St. 11 37 8 0.22 4 47 .085 439 11.86 7 0.19 93 2.51 0 14 14 0.38 22.0 0.6
2 T Dilfer TCU 11 39 17 0.44 10 54 .130 429 11.00 24 0.62 94 2.41 1 22 23 0.59 53.0 1.4
3 A Shook Texas 8 30 14 0.47 7 44 .159 326 10.87 4 0.13 57 1.90 1 13 14 0.47 25.5 0.8
4 H Lockin Baylor 8 31 11 0.35 5 31 .194 332 10.71 2 0.06 74 2.39 0 17 17 0.55 21.5 0.7
5 K McLaughlin Oklahoma 12 46 25 0.54 7 64 .281 484 10.52 10 0.22 126 2.74 1 25 26 0.57 48.5 1.1
6 P Mauck Iowa St. 11 40 26 0.65 4 60 .367 410 10.25 8 0.20 77 1.93 4 24 28 0.70 50.0 1.3
7 M Owens Texas Tech 13 44 53 1.20 16 111 .333 417 9.48 8 0.18 84 1.91 2 26 28 0.64 76.0 1.7
8 L Zerwas West Virginia 11 28 3 0.11 5 18 -.111 227 8.11 5 0.18 52 1.86 0 15 15 0.54 15.5 0.6
9 E Slinde West Virginia 10 24 14 0.58 5 35 .257 174 7.25 4 0.17 46 1.92 1 12 13 0.54 25.0 1.0
10 C Ennis Kansas 8 33 23 0.70 12 71 .155 192 5.82 7 0.21 89 2.70 0 11 11 0.33 35.5 1.1

Digs

RK
1 H Hillegas Iowa St. 13 48 1 0.02 1 3 .000 26 0.54 8 0.17 262 5.46 0 0 0 0.00 9.0 0.2
2 E Solano Texas Tech 14 48 1 0.02 2 9 -.111 24 0.50 11 0.23 195 4.06 0 0 0 0.00 12.0 0.3
3 K Kinley Oklahoma 12 46 3 0.07 2 9 .111 41 0.89 6 0.13 193 4.20 0 0 0 0.00 9.0 0.2
4 T Wulf Baylor 11 45 1 0.02 0 1 1.000 44 0.98 5 0.11 178 3.96 0 0 0 0.00 6.0 0.1
5 L Maclean TCU 11 39 4 0.10 0 23 .174 21 0.54 9 0.23 143 3.67 0 0 0 0.00 13.0 0.3
6 L Angello Kansas 10 42 1 0.02 2 5 -.200 37 0.88 6 0.14 141 3.36 0 0 0 0.00 7.0 0.2
7 J Schaben Iowa St. 13 48 169 3.52 55 520 .219 9 0.19 3 0.06 137 2.85 6 19 25 0.52 187.5 3.9
8 A Philo Baylor 11 45 126 2.80 50 354 .215 7 0.16 4 0.09 136 3.02 0 12 12 0.27 136.0 3.0
9 E Hill Texas Tech 14 49 160 3.27 56 458 .227 19 0.39 21 0.43 130 2.65 3 20 23 0.47 194.0 4.0
10 D Fairfield Kansas St. 11 37 1 0.03 0 1 1.000 20 0.54 0 0.00 129 3.49 0 0 0 0.00 1.0 0.0

Blocks

RK
1 M Flowers Kansas St. 10 25 46 1.84 13 113 .292 5 0.20 2 0.08 14 0.56 2 39 41 1.64 69.5 2.8
2 K DeMeo West Virginia 11 38 80 2.11 22 178 .326 0 0.00 0 0.00 7 0.18 7 54 61 1.61 114.0 3.0
3 K Keenan Texas Tech 13 46 93 2.02 20 214 .341 3 0.07 0 0.00 5 0.11 7 59 66 1.43 129.5 2.8
4 P Anderson Oklahoma 12 45 69 1.53 21 163 .294 3 0.07 0 0.00 9 0.20 4 54 58 1.29 100.0 2.2
5 K Luketic Texas 5 16 39 2.44 20 94 .202 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.25 0 20 20 1.25 49.0 3.1
6 A Rhodes Iowa St. 9 30 59 1.97 22 147 .252 2 0.07 0 0.00 13 0.43 4 33 37 1.23 79.5 2.6
7 Z Hill Kansas 10 39 84 2.15 28 174 .322 2 0.05 1 0.03 8 0.21 5 43 48 1.23 111.5 2.9
8 M Johnson Texas 8 30 53 1.77 15 128 .297 4 0.13 2 0.07 15 0.50 1 35 36 1.20 73.5 2.5
9 G Lazard Iowa St. 13 48 123 2.56 35 267 .330 8 0.17 15 0.31 39 0.81 5 52 57 1.19 169.0 3.5
10 M Nwoke Kansas 10 39 58 1.49 21 151 .245 1 0.03 0 0.00 6 0.15 5 41 46 1.18 83.5 2.1

Service Aces

RK
1 T Dilfer TCU 11 39 17 0.44 10 54 .130 429 11.00 24 0.62 94 2.41 1 22 23 0.59 53.0 1.4
2 A Schultejans Kansas St. 11 34 86 2.53 35 234 .218 4 0.12 18 0.53 24 0.71 1 18 19 0.56 114.0 3.4
3 E Hill Texas Tech 14 49 160 3.27 56 458 .227 19 0.39 21 0.43 130 2.65 3 20 23 0.47 194.0 4.0
4 T Marburger Baylor 8 26 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 10 0.38 14 0.54 0 0 0 0.00 10.0 0.4
5 G Lazard Iowa St. 13 48 123 2.56 35 267 .330 8 0.17 15 0.31 39 0.81 5 52 57 1.19 169.0 3.5
6 Z Gyimes Kansas St. 11 37 3 0.08 2 8 .125 2 0.05 11 0.30 8 0.22 0 2 2 0.05 15.0 0.4
7 S Petersen Texas 8 30 2 0.07 0 2 1.000 15 0.50 8 0.27 100 3.33 0 0 0 0.00 10.0 0.3
8 S Maras Oklahoma 12 38 72 1.89 45 255 .106 1 0.03 10 0.26 31 0.82 3 12 15 0.39 91.0 2.4
9 K Northcut Texas Tech 14 34 0 0.00 0 8 .000 8 0.24 8 0.24 69 2.03 0 0 0 0.00 8.0 0.2
10 K Jordan West Virginia 12 43 66 1.53 34 168 .190 2 0.05 10 0.23 21 0.49 2 44 46 1.07 100.0 2.3

Leave a Reply

avatar

Don't want to miss anything?

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest updates!