2017 CEV EUROPEAN WOMEN’S CHAMPIONSHIPS
- September 22 to October 1
- Azerbaijan and Georgia
- Power Rankings
- Day 1 Recap
- Day 2 Recap
- Day 3 Recap
- Day 4 Recap
- Playoffs Day 1 Recap
- Playoffs Day 2 Recap
- Final 8 Preview and Picks
- Quarterfinals Day 1
- Quarterfinals Day 2
- Final 4 Preview and Picks
- Semifinals
- Finals Preview and Picks
- Gold and Bronze Medals Matches
- MVP and Dream Team
Statistical trends can greatly help us in our understanding of the game and the way it is evolving, . For example, in this years EuroVolley competition, data has shown us that the world’s top teams are each day more and more capable of boasting efficient attack lines regardless of reception efficiency.
This goes against the famous volleyball notion that says that statistical efficiency in each of the game’s fundamentals greatly correlates to the efficiency of its preceding action (on the offensive end, attacking correlates to setting, which correlates to receiving, and on the defensive end digging correlates to blocking, which correlates to serving). Serbia, Azerbaijan, and The Netherlands led the tournament in attacking, but were nowhere to be found in the reception statistics. This shows how the female game is catching up to its male counterparts, with its biggest stars being able to attack the ball with power on off the net sets, for example.
Below, you’ll find these trends and much more:
Team Statistics
Reception % | |
UKRAINE | 51% |
GERMANY | 48% |
BULGARIA | 47% |
HUNGARY | 46% |
RUSSIA | 45% |
Reception Efficiency | |
UKRAINE | 45% |
BULGARIA | 41% |
GERMANY | 41% |
TURKEY | 37% |
RUSSIA | 37% |
Attack % | |
SERBIA | 51% |
THE NETHERLANDS | 45% |
AZERBAIJAN | 45% |
CROATIA | 44% |
ITALY | 43% |
Attack Efficiency | |
SERBIA | 36% |
THE NETHERLANDS | 33% |
AZERBAIJAN | 31% |
CROATIA | 29% |
BELGIUM | 26% |
Blocks per set | |
RUSSIA | 3,5 |
POLAND | 3,2 |
TURKEY | 3,1 |
BELGIUM | 2,8 |
CROATIA | 2,7 |
Aces per Set | |
ITALY | 2,3 |
SERBIA | 2,2 |
BELGIUM | 1,8 |
TURKEY | 1,7 |
AZERBAIJAN | 1,6 |
BULGARIA | 1,6 |
CROATIA | 1,6 |
Individual Player Statistics
Scoring
Highest scorers (Total points) | |||
1 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 151 |
2 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 130 |
3 | Lonneke SLÖETJES | THE NETHERLANDS | 113 |
4 | Anne BUIJS | THE NETHERLANDS | 110 |
5 | Malwina SMARZEK | POLAND | 103 |
Highest Scorers (Points per set) | |||
1 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 7,22 |
2 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 6,86 |
3 | Malwina SMARZEK | POLAND | 6,44 |
4 | Paola EGONU | ITALY | 6,07 |
5 | Lise HECKE | BELGIUM | 5,83 |
Blocking
Total Blocks | |||
1 | Eda DÜNDAR | TURKEY | 26 |
2 | Kübra CALISKAN | TURKEY | 24 |
3 | Hristina RUSEVA | BULGARIA | 20 |
4 | Yvon BELIEN | THE NETHERLANDS | 17 |
5 | Agnieszka KAKOLEWSKA | POLAND | 15 |
5 | Irina KOROLEVA | RUSSIA | 15 |
Blocks per set | |||
1 | Irina FETISOVA | RUSSIA | 1,08 |
2 | Kübra CALISKAN | TURKEY | 1,04 |
3 | Hristina RUSEVA | BULGARIA | 1,0 |
4 | Eda DÜNDAR | TURKEY | 0,96 |
5 | Agnieszka KAKOLEWSKA | POLAND | 0,94 |
5 | Irina KOROLEVA | RUSSIA | 0,94 |
Block Efficiency | |||
1 | Hristina RUSEVA | BULGARIA | 41,67% |
2 | Eda DÜNDAR | TURKEY | 34,88% |
3 | Malwina SMARZEK | POLAND | 31,58% |
4 | Agnieszka KAKOLEWSKA | POLAND | 28,57% |
5 | Ivana PROKOPIC | CROATIA | 26,32% |
Reception
Perfect Receptions (Minimun of 120 receptions) | |||
1 | Jennifer GEERTIES | GERMANY | 59,12% |
2 | Hatice ÖRGE | TURKEY | 52,74% |
3 | Elitsa VASILEVA | BULGARIA | 52,59% |
4 | Dobriana RABADZHIEVA | BULGARIA | 48,76% |
5 | Anna STEPANIUK | UKRAINE | 48,48% |
Reception Efficiency (Minimun of 130 receptions) | |||
1 | Jennifer GEERTIES | GERMANY | 54,14% |
2 | Hatice ÖRGE | TURKEY | 43,84% |
3 | Gözde KIRDAR | TURKEY | 41,10% |
4 | Anna STEPANIUK | UKRAINE | 40,91% |
5 | Elitsa VASILEVA | BULGARIA | 40,74% |
Serving
Total Aces | |||
1 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 14 |
2 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 11 |
3 | Eda DÜNDAR | TURKEY | 10 |
4 | Paola EGONU | ITALY | 9 |
5 | Jovana STEVANOVIC | SERBIA | 9 |
5 | Kübra CALISKAN | TURKEY | 9 |
Aces per set | |||
1 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 0,64 |
2 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 0,61 |
3 | Paola EGONU | ITALY | 0,6 |
4 | Celine GESTEL | BELGIUM | 0,56 |
5 | Cristina CHIRICHELLA | ITALY | 0,53 |
Serve Efficiency (Minimun of 40 serves) | |||
1 | AELBRECHT Freya | BELGIUM | 11,63% |
2 | ÖNAL Güldeniz | TURKEY | 8,11% |
3 | GRAJBER Martyna | POLAND | 7,55% |
4 | BOSETTI Caterina Chiara | ITALY | 7,02% |
5 | VAN DE VYVER Ilka | BELGIUM | 6,52% |
Setting
Setter Efficiency (Minimun of 100 sets) | |||
1 | Laura DIJKEMA | THE NETHERLANDS | 47,02% |
2 | Ekaterina KOSIANENKO | RUSSIA | 44,55% |
3 | Bojana ZIVKOVIC | SERBIA | 41,61% |
4 | Krystsina YAGUBOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 35,23% |
5 | Ana GRBAC | CROATIA | 34,45% |
Spiking
Total Spikes | |||
1 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 125 |
2 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 109 |
3 | Lonneke SLÖETJES | THE NETHERLANDS | 103 |
4 | Anne BUIJS | THE NETHERLANDS | 96 |
5 | Neriman OZSOY | TURKEY | 92 |
Spikes per set | |||
1 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 109 |
2 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 125 |
3 | Malwina SMARZEK | POLAND | 86 |
4 | Lise HECKE | BELGIUM | 61 |
5 | Paola EGONU | ITALY | 76 |
Spike Efficiency (Minimun of 130 spikes) | |||
1 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 39,90% |
2 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 35,79% |
3 | Katarina ŠUŠNJAR | CROATIA | 34,11% |
4 | Lise HECKE | BELGIUM | 33,08% |
5 | Anne BUIJS | THE NETHERLANDS | 32,87% |
Perfect Spikes (Minimum of 130 spikes) | |||
1 | Tijana BOŠKOVIC | SERBIA | 55,05% |
2 | Paola EGONU | ITALY | 50,67% |
3 | Lise HECKE | BELGIUM | 46,92% |
4 | Natalya MAMMADOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 46,21% |
5 | Polina RAHIMOVA | AZERBAIJAN | 46,13% |
Leave a Reply